Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belvisi, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belvisi, M. G.
The Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 1:207-214 (2004)
© 2004 The American Thoracic Society

Regulation of Inflammatory Cell Function by Corticosteroids

Maria G. Belvisi

Respiratory Pharmacology Group, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Maria G. Belvisi, Ph.D., Respiratory Pharmacology Group, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, National Heart & Lung Institute, Guy Scadding Building, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK. E-mail: m.belvisi{at}Imperial.ac.uk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 
Different inflammatory cell profiles are observed in the lungs of patients with asthma versus those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In asthma, several key mediators have been implicated, including tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and interleukin (IL)-1ß, together with cytokines derived from type 2 T-helper lymphocytes, such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. In fact, inhibitors of IL-4 and IL-5 show promise as therapeutic agents. In COPD, the predominant inflammatory cell types are CD8+ T lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. Glucocorticoids inhibit eosinophils in asthma, neutrophils in COPD and severe asthma, mast cells and basophils in asthma and COPD, and macrophages in COPD. However, it is generally assumed that neutrophils are less sensitive to glucocorticoids than are eosinophils and T cells, and that macrophages from patients with COPD are less sensitive to steroid treatment under certain circumstances. These differences in the responsiveness of activated inflammatory cells may help to explain why inhaled corticosteroid treatment has been more beneficial for patients with asthma than for patients with COPD.

Key Words: asthma • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease • inhaled corticosteroids • mechanisms

This article concentrates on the differences in the inflammatory cell profiles observed in animal models and in the lungs of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It discusses the effects of glucocorticoids in experimental models of both diseases and on disease progression. In particular, this article focuses on the effect of steroids on eosinophil, neutrophil, mast cell/basophil, and macrophage function.


    INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA AND COPD
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 
Asthma
Inflammatory cells.
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that is characterized by variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to various stimuli (1, 2). Airway inflammation in asthma is characterized by an eosinophilic inflammation evidenced by an increase in activated eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, bronchial biopsies, and induced sputum (1, 3, 4). There is also an increase in CD4+ T-helper type 2 (Th2) lymphocytes. These lymphocytes are thought to orchestrate the degranulation of mast cells that are involved in the acute bronchospasm and the eosinophilic inflammation that characterize the asthmatic airway. It is still not clear whether airway inflammation is directly associated with the development of AHR. Wenzel and colleagues have described a prominent neutrophilia in bronchial biopsies of patients with severe asthma (5).

Inflammatory mediators.
It is now generally recognized that cytokines play an important role in the inflammatory response that is evident in the asthmatic airway (Figure 1). Several key mediators have been implicated, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} and interleukin (IL)-1ß, together with cytokines that are derived from Th2 cells (e.g., IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-9) that seem to be more specifically linked to the pathology seen in allergic airway diseases such as asthma (6).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Differences between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with regard to airway inflammation profile. In asthma, several key mediators have been implicated, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} and interleukin (IL)-1ß, together with T helper (Th)2 cytokines. In COPD, fixed airway obstruction is associated with an increased number of T lymphocytes (predominantly CD8+), macrophages, and neutrophils. LT indicates leukotriene; PG, prostaglandin; MBP, major basic protein; ECP, eosinophilic cationic protein; IFN, interferon; NE, neutrophil elastase.

 
Recently, attention has been focused on the utility of various biotherapeutics that are targeted at inhibiting specific Th2 cytokines. IL-4 is thought to be an upstream cytokine that regulates allergic inflammation by promoting Th2 cell differentiation and IgE synthesis. An IL-4 antagonist, soluble recombinant receptor (altrakincept), has shown some efficacy as a steroid-replacing agent in moderate to severe asthma, suggesting that IL-4 plays a role in asthma (7). IL-5 may have a dominant role in asthma pathology. In preclinical animal models, IL-5 has been shown to be involved in eosinophilic inflammation, and neutralizing antibodies directed against this cytokine inhibit eosinophilic inflammation and AHR. Studies using a humanized anti–IL-5 monoclonal antibody (mepolizumab) in patients with asthma have confirmed the inhibitory effect in reducing eosinophils in the circulation and in induced sputum, but demonstrated that the reduction in eosinophils did not have any impact on AHR, although this data may be difficult to interpret given that AHR was not induced by allergen challenge on the control challenge day of this study (8). These data confirm involvement for IL-5 in eosinophilic inflammation but call into question a role for eosinophils in AHR. Interestingly, a recent study has posed a novel role for IL-5 and eosinophils in the tissue remodeling process seen in asthma (9). In this study an anti–IL-5 antibody decreased the numbers of airway eosinophils and the expression of tenascin, lumican, and procollagen III in the bronchial mucosal reticular basement (RBM) when compared with placebo in patients with asthma. In addition, anti–IL-5 treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the numbers and percentage of eosinophils expressing mRNA for the growth factor, transforming growth factor-ß1. IL-13, like IL-4, regulates IgE production, but unlike IL-4, IL-13 does not regulate T-cell differentiation. IL-13 can also directly cause AHR, which has implicated this cytokine in asthma pathogenesis (10).

Eosinophil chemotactic cytokines (CC chemokines), such as eotaxin and RANTES (the chemokine regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted), are also important in asthmatic inflammation and are involved in the recruitment of primed eosinophils from the circulation into the airway (11, 12). Enzymes released from inflammatory cells may also be involved in asthma pathology. For example, mast cell products such as tryptase and chymase may play a role in AHR (13).

COPD
Inflammatory cells.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is characterized by reduced maximum expiratory flow. The airways of patients with COPD are markedly inflamed, but the predominant inflammatory cell types differ from those evident in asthma pathology. The fixed airway obstruction is associated with an airway inflammatory profile consisting mainly of an increased number of T lymphocytes (predominantly CD8+), macrophages, and neutrophils (14, 15).

Fabbri and coworkers (16) recently evaluated airway inflammation in patients with fixed airflow obstruction due to asthma or COPD. Compared with patients with COPD with similarly severe disease and of similar age, subjects with a history of asthma had significantly more eosinophils in peripheral blood, sputum, BAL fluid, and airway mucosa; fewer neutrophils in sputum and BAL fluid; a higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio of T cells infiltrating the airway mucosa; and a thicker reticular layer of the epithelial basement membrane (16). Furthermore, in contrast with asthma, infiltration of the airways with neutrophils, macrophages, and CD8+ lymphocytes in COPD was associated with remodeling of the airways, characterized by goblet cell metaplasia and mucus plugging, smooth muscle hypertrophy, airway wall fibrosis, and destruction of lung parenchyma (16). These data contrast with those from Wenzel and associates, who described a prominent neutrophilia in bronchial biopsy specimens of patients with asthma who had a similar degree of airflow obstruction (5, 17). However, Fabbri and coworkers studied patients who were steroid-dependent and had been receiving high doses of inhaled and/or oral glucocorticosteroids for many years, indicating more severe disease.

Studies of induced sputum show that the increase in neutrophils is greater in patients with COPD than in smokers without airway obstruction (18, 19). Neutrophil activation markers (e.g., myeloperoxidase) are elevated in the sputum supernatant of subjects with COPD, suggesting that neutrophils might be involved in the pathophysiology of this disease (18, 19). Studies have also investigated the inflammatory cell profile in the lung parenchyma, where the macrophage was the major cell type found, together with CD8+ T cells, in areas of parenchymal destruction.

Inflammatory mediators.
It has been hypothesized that the cells that initiate the response to toxic agents such as cigarette smoke are in all probability macrophages and the epithelial cells that line the airway (14). Data have suggested that activated epithelial cells and macrophages have a part in the pathology of COPD by releasing neutrophil-specific chemotactic factors (CXC chemokines), such as IL-8 and growth-related oncogene-{alpha} (14). Furthermore, the level of IL-8 in induced sputum is correlated with disease severity (as assessed by FEV1% predicted) and the neutrophilic burden (18). TNF-{alpha} is also present in high concentrations in induced sputum from patients with COPD, which may lead to an increase in IL-8 gene expression via the activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) (18). Leukotriene B4 is also likely to be a key mediator involved in the pathophysiology of COPD compared with asthma, given its role as a potent neutrophil chemoattractant. Elevated levels of leukotriene B4 have been found in induced sputum of patients with COPD (20, 21).

The pathogenesis of airway obstruction/emphysema is multifactorial, involving macrophages, neutrophilic airway inflammation, protease–antiprotease imbalance, oxidative stress, and recurrent infection. Protease–antiprotease imbalance is thought to play a key role in cigarette smoke–induced chronic lung disease, and it has received considerable attention in recent years. It proposes that an antiprotease "shield" protects the normal lung from locally elaborated proteases and that emphysema is the result of an abnormal increase in proteases and/or reduction in pulmonary antiproteases, which leads to parenchymal destruction (22). Investigators have previously suggested that the various proteases, particularly elastase, break down the connective tissue within the lung structures to produce emphysema. Most work has focused on the role of the serine proteases neutrophil elastase and proteinase-3 and the cathepsin family, which have been demonstrated to produce emphysema in animal models (23, 24). {alpha}1-Antitrypsin inhibits the action of neutrophil elastase in the parenchyma and its absence may account for the emphysema seen in the syndrome known as {alpha}1-antitrypsin deficiency. However, there is now increasing evidence that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) might play a role in cigarette smoking–related emphysema (25, 26).

With regard to the expression of MMPs in the lung, several researchers have shown increased concentrations of MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-9 in BAL fluid from patients with emphysema (27, 28). Furthermore, there appears to be an increase in the expression and activity of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9, but not MMP-12, in the lung parenchyma of patients with emphysema (2931). The main cellular sources of enzymatic activity in the lower respiratory tract are neutrophils and alveolar macrophages, both of which are increased in the smoker's lung. Many studies have focused on the proteolytic potential of neutrophils, which includes neutrophil elastase and MMPs with collagenase and gelatinase activity (MMP-9, MMP-8) (32). However, some studies have implicated alveolar macrophages as the major inflammatory effector cells in the lungs of patients with emphysema. In fact, researchers have found that there is a direct relationship between the number of alveolar macrophages and lung destruction, and that MMPs are produced during macrophage-dependent lung injury. Thus, recently there has been considerable interest in the potential role of macrophage-derived MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-12) in matrix degradation in emphysema. Additional studies using transgenic and gene-targeted mice have supported expression data generated in human normal and diseased tissues and have confirmed a role for MMPs in the pathogenesis of emphysema. In particular, studies in MMP-12 knockout mice have showed that MMP-12 is involved in the development of smoke-induced emphysema (33). However, the role of macrophage-derived MMP-12 in the genesis of human emphysema is still far from clear. Furthermore, in recent studies no difference has been demonstrated between patients with emphysema and normal volunteers with respect to the level of MMP-12 within BAL fluid (34).


    REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL FUNCTION BY GLUCOCORTICOIDS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 
Eosinophils
Accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral blood and tissues is a major feature of inflammatory airway diseases such as asthma and rhinitis. The clinical efficacy of glucocorticoids can be attributed to several actions on this cell type, including reduction of circulating eosinophil numbers and the percentage exhibiting a hypodense phenotype; inhibition of the recruitment of eosinophils to sites of inflammation after allergen provocation in in vitro and in vivo animal models (3537); and reduction in the number of eosinophils and their secretory products in the blood, BAL fluid, nasal fluid, and the airway mucosa (38).

It has been known for some time that glucocorticoids inhibit the formation of eosinophil-rich colonies in in vitro bone marrow assays, but these assays are often difficult to interpret given the presence of cells other than eosinophil progenitor cells in the culture systems used. The current theory is that glucocorticoids probably suppress eosinophil maturation by inhibiting the production and/or release of IL-5 and other eosinopoietic factors from cells within the bone marrow rather than by directly affecting CD34+ progenitors. Similarly, glucocorticoids do not appear to have a direct effect on adhesion per se but rather are reported to inhibit the accumulation of eosinophils at the site of inflammation by inhibiting the generation of chemoattractants and the upregulation of certain adhesion molecules (38).

Scientific dogma would suggest that the induction of apoptosis of airway tissue eosinophils is a major component of the pharmacologic profile of steroids used for the treatment of asthma (39, 40). In fact, spontaneous or steroid-induced eosinophil apoptosis can be easily shown in vitro (41, 42). Eosinophil apoptosis in diseased airway tissues in vivo, with or without steroid treatment, has not been compellingly demonstrated (43), but it is certainly clear that apoptotic eosinophils are often found in the airway lumen (44).

Neutrophils
Neutrophils have been implicated in the pathophysiology of COPD and more severe asthma (17, 45). It is generally assumed that neutrophils are less sensitive to glucocorticoids than, for example, eosinophils and T cells (46). Interestingly, in contrast to T cells, glucocorticoid treatment inhibits neutrophil cell death in vitro (47, 48). The antiinflammatory effects of steroids are mediated through activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). There are actually two homologous mRNAs and protein isoforms, termed GR-{alpha} and GR-ß. The differences in structure between the two receptors make GR-ß unable to bind glucocorticoids, reduce its binding affinity for DNA recognition sites, abolish its ability to transactivate glucocorticoid-sensitive genes, and allow it to function as a dominant inhibitor of GR-{alpha}, possibly through the formation of antagonistic GR-{alpha}/GR-ß heterodimers (49, 50). GR-ß attenuates pathways mediated by the glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and so may provide a natural mechanism for reducing glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis. In fact, one study has suggested that dexamethasone reduces the rate of spontaneous cell death by neutrophils, and that preincubation of neutrophils with IL-8 enhances the protective effect (51).

Mast Cells and Basophils
The initial response after antigen challenge is characterized by mast cell degranulation and the release of mast cell–derived mediators (e.g., histamine and prostaglandin D2). Human mast cells and basophils have been implicated as a major source of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-5, and these observations have led investigators to examine whether steroids can modulate the synthesis/release of these mediators (52, 53).

Glucocorticoids have been shown to reduce the numbers of mast cells in airway mucosal biopsy specimens from human subjects with mild atopic asthma (54). Investigators have found that prolonged in vitro incubation with steroids (12–24 hours) inhibited IgE-mediated histamine release from basophils (55), whereas incubation of mast cells from lung parenchyma with steroids for similar time periods did not alter the release of histamine, prostaglandin D2, or leukotriene C4 (56). Interestingly, in more recent studies, short preincubation of human basophils with several glucocorticoids inhibited the immunologic release of IL-4 but not histamine, suggesting that different mechanisms control the release of cytokines and histamine (57). These in vitro data are supported by in vivo studies that suggest a minimal effect of glucocorticoids on mast cell degranulation and the appearance of mast cell mediators after segmental antigen challenge in subjects with asthma (58). The failure of steroids to inhibit mast cell mediator release in vivo is similar to results in nasal and cutaneous challenge model systems and is consistent with the in vitro data described above.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study in which patients with COPD received inhaled fluticasone for 3 months, fluticasone affected the numbers of subepithelial mast cells found in biopsy tissue. This reduction in mast cell numbers may account for the effect of fluticasone on the improvement of symptoms during this time and the decrease in exacerbations seen in long-term studies (59, 60).

Macrophages
Macrophages are derived from circulating monocytes, and during the differentiation process the profile of MMP expression in these cells changes from a predominantly MMP-7 phenotype toward expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Human macrophages are known to produce several MMPs, including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-12 (34). Furthermore, alveolar macrophages from patients with COPD release greater amounts of MMP-1 and MMP-9, with greater enzymatic activity (at least for MMP-1 and MMP-9), than do macrophages from healthy smokers and nonsmokers. Interestingly, alveolar macrophages from nonsmokers release more tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) than do cells from healthy smokers and subjects with COPD (34).

Recent experiments have shown that basal release of IL-8 was approximately fivefold greater from alveolar macrophages in patients with COPD than from those in smokers, whereas levels of granulocyte macrophage colony–stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were similar for each group. IL-1ß and cigarette smoke increased IL-8 and GM-CSF release by macrophages from both smokers and patients with COPD. Dexamethasone did not inhibit basal or stimulated IL-8 release from patients with COPD, but inhibited its release in smokers. In contrast, dexamethasone inhibited basal and IL-1ß–stimulated GM-CSF release but not cigarette smoke–stimulated release (61). In addition, corticosteroids fail to decrease MMP-9 activity induced by cigarette smoke, in spite of decreasing MMP-9 protein release. This lack of effect of corticosteroids may be one of the reasons for the lack of efficacy of corticosteroids seen clinically in COPD treatment (62).


    REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL FUNCTION BY GLUCOCORTICOIDS IN ANIMAL MODELS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 
Asthma
Glucocorticoid-induced inhibition of the recruitment of eosinophils to sites of inflammation after allergen provocation is readily demonstrated in in vivo animal models (3537). Airway eosinophilia is regulated predominantly by activated CD4+ T cells that release Th2 cell–derived cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and chemokines such as eotaxin. Thus, it is generally believed that steroids act predominantly by inhibiting the generation of these cytokines and chemokines (38).

Steroid-induced eosinophil apoptosis can be readily demonstrated in vitro, and this may be a major mechanism by which eosinophilia is inhibited by steroids in vivo. However, recent data suggest that steroid treatment may not increase eosinophil apoptosis in vivo in a rat model and that steroids permit elimination of eosinophils into the airway lumen, a process that slowly resolves established lung eosinophilia. The authors of this study suggest that the reduced tissue eosinophilia seen after several days of steroid treatment in this model may be explained by inhibition of eosinophil recruitment together with unimpeded clearance of lung tissue eosinophils into the airway lumen (63) (Figure 2).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lung tissue eosinophils may be cleared by luminal entry rather than by apoptosis. (Adapted by permission from Reference 63.)

 
Interestingly, animal studies have demonstrated dissociation between the dose of steroid needed to inhibit eosinophilia in antigen-induced BAL fluid and lung tissue and that needed to affect AHR. The dose of dexamethasone required to inhibit AHR was higher than that needed to inhibit eosinophilia in a murine model of allergic airway inflammation (36). These data suggest that eosinophilia is not associated with AHR. They cast doubt on the rationale that many pharmaceutical companies are adopting in developing low-molecular-weight compounds that target eosinophil activation and recruitment for the treatment of asthma.

Given the lack of support for the importance of eosinophils and eosinophil-related cytokines (e.g., IL-5) in AHR, a recent study has examined the possibility that the effects of dexamethasone may be due to a reduction in IL-13. However, the murine model of allergic inflammation showed that anti–IL-5/antieotaxin treatment was as effective as dexamethasone in reducing levels of IL-13 and eosinophil recruitment, but had no effect on AHR (64).

COPD
Aerosol or intranasal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces intense lung inflammation, with macrophage activation and recruitment of neutrophils to the interstitium, alveoli, and airways of guinea pigs, rats, and mice (65, 66). This response requires the upregulation of adhesion molecules on circulating leukocytes and the pulmonary vascular endothelium and the expression of endogenous chemotactic factors.

The mechanism of pulmonary neutrophil migration in rats given topical LPS has been partially characterized and involves production by airway cells of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IL-1, as well as CXC chemokines, which in rats include the family of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractants (CINCs) and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), also known as CINC-3. CD18 integrins have also been shown to play a role in full polymorphonuclear cell migration. Expression of CD18 adhesion molecules on the polymorphonuclear cell surface can be induced by exposure to LPS or TNF-{alpha} and to chemokines such as CINC-1 and MIP-2. Several studies have demonstrated that steroids can inhibit the inflammatory cascade after LPS administration, as measured by the early expression of several of these proinflammatory cytokines and the subsequent accumulation of neutrophils in the airways (6567).

Exposure of A/J mice to tobacco smoke on multiple occasions (11 consecutive daily exposures) induced a pulmonary inflammation that included increases in neutrophils and macrophages. Treatment with dexamethasone had no effect on the increase in neutrophils seen in BAL fluid after tobacco smoke exposure (68). This lack of activity of a steroid in a tobacco smoke model is also seen in elastase models of airway inflammation (M. A. Birrell and M. G. Belvisi, unpublished observations). It is in contrast to the steroid sensitivity of the LPS models, but it is similar to the lack of antiinflammatory activity of steroids seen in COPD.

In fact, in contrast to the lack of activity of steroids in some models, previous investigations have shown that corticosteroids affect the development and maturation of the developing lung in utero and in neonatal animals in a negative fashion. Systemic corticosteroids are routinely used for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD, and inhaled corticosteroids are more frequently being prescribed for the long-term treatment of patients with COPD. Because corticosteroids can affect matrix metalloproteinases and because the concept of protease/antiprotease imbalance is an important concept regarding the pathogenesis of emphysema, a recent study examined the effects of chronic steroid treatment on lung structure in adult rats. Interestingly, methylprednisolone causes matrix metalloproteinase–dependent emphysema in adult rats, and the animals showed increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in their lungs on zymography. Rats treated concomitantly with methylprednisolone and a broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (GM6001) did not develop emphysema. These data suggest that systemic treatment of adult rats with the antiinflammatory steroid methylprednisolone increases the activity of matrix metalloproteinases in the lung and causes emphysema (69).


    EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID TREATMENT IN AIRWAY INFLAMMATORY DISEASES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 
Asthma
Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective prophylactic therapy available for the treatment of asthma, particularly in patients with mild to moderate asthma and persistent symptoms (70). Airway inflammation is thought to underlie the increased airway responsiveness seen in asthma, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) reduce airway responsiveness to a variety of direct and indirect stimuli in patients with mild asthma (7173). In fact, studies investigating the effect of ICSs on bronchial biopsy and BAL samples in patients with asthma have demonstrated that the increased numbers of CD4+ T lymphocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells seen in this disease are substantially reduced by ICS (54, 7476). Steroids are thought to possess this beneficial therapeutic profile on lung function principally via their antiinflammatory properties, and regular treatment has been shown to improve lung function, control exacerbations, and attenuate surrogate markers of airway inflammation such as the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum (77). Interestingly, it has been suggested that the beneficial effects of glucocorticoids in subjects with asthma may be due, in part, to inhibitory effects on the synthesis of cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LTs), which are potent stimulators of mucus secretion (78), vascular permeability (79), and airway smooth muscle contraction (80). In vitro studies have demonstrated both inhibitory and stimulatory effects of steroids on cys-LT synthesis in cell-based assays; however, in vivo studies have failed to demonstrate any effects of steroids on cys-LT levels in the urine of both healthy (81, 82) and atopic subjects with asthma (83) and in BAL fluid from individuals with asthma (84).

The antiinflammatory properties of steroids are thought to be mediated via the GR. The finding that the rank order of potency of various steroids in eliciting antiinflammatory events correlates with their affinity for the GR supports this contention. The GR is ubiquitously expressed in most cell types, and activation mediates both the antiinflammatory effects and the various side effects elicited by these ligands. The GR is a ligand-activated transcription factor. In the absence of ligand binding the receptor is localized in the cytoplasm as a protein complex together with heat shock proteins hsp90, hsp70, and hsp40, along with p60/Hop and other chaperone molecules. Upon ligand binding the complex dissociates and the receptor translocates to the nucleus, where it can bind to a GRE in a target gene promoter and regulate transcription, a process known as transactivation. The positive regulation of target genes is mediated by a specific binding of the GR-DNA to GREs in the promoter or enhancer regions of responsive genes, followed by an induction or increase in gene transcription (e.g., tyrosine aminotransferase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase). However, negative regulation by GREs has also been reported, so that the activated GR can bind to negative GREs, leading to the repression of gene transcription. This mechanism has been described for the regulation of the osteocalcin and the proopiomelanocortin gene promoters. The GR may interact with other transcription factors (e.g., activator protein [AP]-1, NF-{kappa}B, Smad3), preventing an activation of transcription by these factors. In these cases the gene expression is controlled without DNA binding, a process known as transrepression.

It is now recognized that therapeutic, antiinflammatory effects of the GR–ligand complex are mediated by transrepression and by transactivation, as well as by other mechanisms. For example, genes that code for antiinflammatory proteins are induced by the GR via a GR-DNA interaction (e.g., lipocortin, IL-1 receptor antagonist, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, IL-10). Alternatively, the majority of the proinflammatory genes coding for cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules are regulated by NF-{kappa}B and AP-1. In this situation the GR acts as a monomer with the subunits of the particular transcription factor, inhibiting its activity and suppressing the expression of various proinflammatory mediators. Based on the large number of proinflammatory genes regulated in this way, a hypothesis was formulated that the transrepression mechanism is largely responsible for GR-mediated antiinflammatory reactions and that the side effects are mediated predominantly via the transactivation mechanism. Evidence to support this hypothesis has been provided by a study investigating the glucocorticoid responsiveness in GR-mutated mice. The mutation prevented dimerization of the receptor and, therefore, the capacity for DNA binding. Interestingly, all DNA-dependent regulatory mechanisms of the GR were disrupted, but the classical glucocorticoid-mediated antiinflammatory effects were observed. Thus, mechanisms solely mediated by GR–protein interactions seem to be sufficient to mediate the antiinflammatory effects. In contrast, it has been demonstrated that some side effects are mediated predominantly via transrepression (e.g., skin atrophy, suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), whereas others are mediated predominantly by transactivation (diabetes mellitus, glaucoma). Even more confusing, some side effects (e.g., osteoporosis) are thought to be mediated by both transactivation and transrepression (85).

COPD
The role of ICSs in the treatment of COPD is still controversial (86). Recent data indicates that ICSs do affect selected aspects of airway inflammation in COPD. Studies have reported a reduction in the CD8:CD4 ratio in the epithelium and in the numbers of subepithelial mast cells in the group treated with fluticasone (500 µg twice daily via dry powder inhaler over a 3-month period) compared with the placebo group. The selective antiinflammatory effect correlated with an improvement of symptoms and a small reduction in the numbers of exacerbations (59, 60). In addition, it has recently been reported that prednisolone has a beneficial effect in patients with COPD who have increased numbers of sputum eosinophils (87).

However, long-term trials have demonstrated that there is no effect of ICS on the annual decline in lung function seen in patients with COPD (8891). However, in patients with more severe disease, there is a small beneficial effect of high-dose ICS on the frequency of exacerbations and the quality of life (92), and in severe exacerbations of COPD, oral corticosteroids do appear to have a small effect on recovery rate (93). Furthermore, 10 to 20% of patients with COPD respond to oral steroids, although this may be due to coexisting asthma (86). These data generated in long-term clinical trials are consistent with data from a study that described no clinical benefit in lung function or symptom scores, and no reduction in induced sputum inflammatory cells, percentage neutrophils, or IL-8 levels, after 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone. Sputum supernatant elastase activity, MMP-1, MMP-9, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, and TIMP-1 were similarly unaffected by treatment (94).

CONCLUSIONS
Current clinical data describe distinct histopathologic and functional phenotypes in patients with asthma and COPD, even though both diseases are characterized by airflow limitation. These differences, in particular those observed between the responsiveness of activated inflammatory cells such as eosinophils and neutrophils, may help to explain the beneficial effects of ICS treatment in patients with asthma compared with patients with COPD.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
M.G.B. has been reimbursed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Altana, Pfizer, and Novartis for attending conferences/meetings and has served as a consultant for GSK and Novartis and has received research grants from GSK and Novartis and has served on advisory boards for Aventis Pharma, Altana, and GSK. Between 1997 and 2000 M.G.B. was an employee of Aventis Pharma.

(Received in original form February 17, 2004; accepted in final form April 13, 2004)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INFLAMMATORY CELLS IN ASTHMA...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 REGULATION OF INFLAMMATORY CELL...
 EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUCOCORTICOID...
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kay AB. Asthma and inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;87:893–910.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Von Mutius E. Presentation of new GINA guidelines for paediatrics: the Global Initiative on Asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:6–10.
  3. Jeffery PK. Structural and inflammatory changes in COPD: a comparison with asthma. Thorax 1998;53:129–136.[Medline]
  4. Barnes PJ. Pathophysiology of asthma. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996;42:3–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wenzel SE, Schwartz LB, Langmack EL, Halliday JL, Trudeau JB, Gibbs RL, Chu HW. Evidence that severe asthma can be divided pathologically into two inflammatory subtypes with distinct physiologic and clinical characteristics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1001–1008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chung KF, Barnes PJ. Cytokines in asthma. Thorax 1999;54:825–857.[Free Full Text]
  7. Borish LC, Nelson HS, Lanz MJ, Claussen L, Whitmore JB, Agosti JM, Garrison L. Interleukin-4 receptor in moderate atopic asthma: a phase I/II randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1816–1823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Leckie MJ, ten Brinke A, Khan J, Diamant Z, O'Connor BJ, Walls CM, Mathur AK, Cowley HC, Chung KF, Djukanovic R, et al. Effects of an interleukin-5 blocking monoclonal antibody on eosinophils, airway hyper-responsiveness, and the late asthmatic response. Lancet 2000; 356:2144–2148.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Flood-Page P, Menzies-Gow A, Phipps S, Ying S, Wangoo A, Ludwig MS, Barnes N, Robinson D, Kay AB. Anti-IL-5 treatment reduces deposition of ECM proteins in the bronchial subepithelial basement membrane of mild atopic asthmatics. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1029–1036.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wills-Karp M. The gene encoding interleukin-13: a susceptibility locus for asthma and related traits. Respir Res 2000;1:19–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Bertrand CP, Ponath PD. CCR3 blockade as a new therapy for asthma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2000;9:43–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Romagnani S. Cytokines and chemoattractants in allergic inflammation. Mol Immunol 2002;38:881–885.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Krishnaswamy G, Kelley J, Johnson D, Youngberg G, Stone W, Huang SK, Bieber J, Chi DS. The human mast cell: functions in physiology and disease. Front Biosci 2001;6:D1109–D1127.[Medline]
  14. Barnes PJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:269–280.[Free Full Text]
  15. Saetta M, Turato G, Maestrelli P, Mapp CE, Fabbri LM. Cellular and structural bases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1304–1309.[Free Full Text]
  16. Fabbri LM, Romagnoli M, Corbetta L, Casoni G, Busljetic K, Turato G, Ligabue G, Ciaccia A, Saetta M, Papi A. Differences in airway inflammation in patients with fixed airflow obstruction due to asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:418–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wenzel SE, Szefler SJ, Leung DY, Sloan SI, Rex MD, Martin RJ. Bronchoscopic evaluation of severe asthma: persistent inflammation associated with high dose glucocorticoids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156:737–743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Keatings VM, Collins PD, Scott DM, Barnes PJ. Differences in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:530–534.[Abstract]
  19. Keatings VM, Barnes PJ. Granulocyte activation markers in induced sputum: comparison between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:449–453.[Abstract]
  20. Beeh KM, Kornmann O, Buhl R, Culpitt SV, Giembycz MA, Barnes PJ. Neutrophil chemotactic activity of sputum from patients with COPD: role of interleukin 8 and leukotriene B4. Chest 2003;123:1240–1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Woolhouse IS, Bayley DL, Stockley RA. Sputum chemotactic activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effect of alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency and the role of leukotriene B(4) and interleukin 8. Thorax 2002;57:709–714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Turino GM. The origins of a concept: the protease-antiprotease imbalance hypothesis. Chest 2002;122:1058–1060.[Free Full Text]
  23. Snider GL, Lucey EC, Stone PJ. Animal models of emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:149–169.[Medline]
  24. Mahadeva R, Shapiro SD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 3. Experimental animal models of pulmonary emphysema. Thorax 2002; 57:908–914.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cawston T, Carrere S, Catterall J, Duggleby R, Elliott S, Shingleton B, Rowan A. Matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs: properties and implications for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Novartis Found Symp 2001;234:205–218.[Medline]
  26. Shapiro SD. Proteinases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2002;30:98–102.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Finlay GA, Russell KJ, McMahon KJ, D'arcy EM, Masterson JB, FitzGerald MX, O'Connor CM. Elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of emphysematous patients. Thorax 1997;52:502–506.[Abstract]
  28. Betsuyaku T, Nishimura M, Takeyabu K, Tanino M, Venge P, Xu S, Kawakami Y. Neutrophil granule proteins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from subjects with subclinical emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1985–1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Segura-Valdez L, Pardo A, Gaxiola M, Uhal BD, Becerril C, Selman M. Upregulation of gelatinases A and B, collagenases 1 and 2, and increased parenchymal cell death in COPD. Chest 2000;117:684–694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Imai K, Dalal SS, Chen ES, Downey R, Schulman LL, Ginsburg M, D'Armiento J. Human collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase-1) expression in the lungs of patients with emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:786–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ohnishi K, Takagi M, Kurokawa Y, Satomi S, Konttinen YT. Matrix metalloproteinase-mediated extracellular matrix protein degradation in human pulmonary emphysema. Lab Invest 1998;78:1077–1087.[Medline]
  32. Hibbs MS, Hasty KA, Seyer JM, Kang AH, Mainardi CL. Biochemical and immunological characterization of the secreted forms of human neutrophil gelatinase. J Biol Chem 1985;260:2493–2500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hautamaki RD, Kobayashi DK, Senior RM, Shapiro SD. Requirement for macrophage elastase for cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. Science 1997;277:2002–2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Belvisi MG, Bottomley KM. The role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a therapeutic role for inhibitors of MMPs? Inflamm Res 2003;52:95–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Elwood W, Lotvall JO, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Effect of dexamethasone and cyclosporin A on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammatory cell responses in sensitized Brown-Norway rats. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:1289–1294.[Medline]
  36. Birrell MA, Battram CH, Woodman P, McCluskie K, Belvisi MG. Dissociation by steroids of eosinophilic inflammation from airway hyperresponsiveness in murine airways. Respir Res 2003;4:3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Underwood SL, Raeburn D, Lawrence C, Foster M, Webber S, Karlsson JA. RPR 106541, a novel, airways-selective glucocorticoid: effects against antigen-induced CD4+ T lymphocyte accumulation and cytokine gene expression in the Brown Norway rat lung. Br J Pharmacol 1997;122:439–446.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Giembycz MA, Lindsay MA. Pharmacology of the eosinophil. Pharmacol Rev 1999;51:213–340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Simon HU, Blaser K. Inhibition of programmed eosinophil death: a key pathogenic event for eosinophilia? Immunol Today 1995;16:53–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Anderson GP. Resolution of chronic inflammation by therapeutic induction of apoptosis. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1996;17:438–442.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Meagher LC, Cousin JM, Seckl JR, Haslett C. Opposing effects of glucocorticoids on the rate of apoptosis in neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes. J Immunol 1996;156:4422–4428.[Abstract]
  42. Adachi T, Motojima S, Hirata A, Fukuda T, Kihara N, Kosaku A, Ohtake H, Makino S. Eosinophil apoptosis caused by theophylline, glucocorticoids, and macrolides after stimulation with IL-5. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;98:S207–S215.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Erjefalt JS, Persson CG. New aspects of degranulation and fates of airway mucosal eosinophils. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:2074–2085.[Free Full Text]
  44. Woolley KL, Gibson PG, Carty K, Wilson AJ, Twaddell SH, Woolley MJ. Eosinophil apoptosis and the resolution of airway inflammation in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:237–243.[Abstract]
  45. Jatakanon A, Uasuf C, Maziak W, Lim S, Chung KF, Barnes PJ. Neutrophilic inflammation in severe persistent asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1532–1539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Schleimer RP. Effects of glucocorticosteroids on inflammatory cells relevant to their therapeutic applications in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:S59–S69.[Medline]
  47. Cox G, Austin RC. Dexamethasone-induced suppression of apoptosis in human neutrophils requires continuous stimulation of new protein synthesis. J Leukoc Biol 1997;61:224–230.[Abstract]
  48. Di Baldassarre A, Secchiero P, Grilli A, Celeghini C, Falcieri E, Zauli G. Morphological features of apoptosis in hematopoietic cells belonging to the T-lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Cell Mol Biol (Noisyle-grand) 2000;46:153–161.
  49. Oakley RH, Sar M, Cidlowski JA. The human glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform: expression, biochemical properties, and putative function. J Biol Chem 1996;271:9550–9559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Oakley RH, Jewell CM, Yudt MR, Bofetiado DM, Cidlowski JA. The dominant negative activity of the human glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform: specificity and mechanisms of action. J Biol Chem 1999;274:27857–27866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Strickland I, Kisich K, Hauk PJ, Vottero A, Chrousos GP, Klemm DJ, Leung DY. High constitutive glucocorticoid receptor beta in human neutrophils enables them to reduce their spontaneous rate of cell death in response to corticosteroids. J Exp Med 2001;193:585–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. MacGlashan D Jr, White JM, Huang SK, Ono SJ, Schroeder JT, Lichtenstein LM. Secretion of IL-4 from human basophils: the relationship between IL-4 mRNA and protein in resting and stimulated basophils. J Immunol 1994;152:3006–3016.[Abstract]
  53. Bradding P, Roberts JA, Britten KM, Montefort S, Djukanovic R, Mueller R, Heusser CH, Howarth PH, Holgate ST. Interleukin-4, -5, and -6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal and asthmatic airways: evidence for the human mast cell as a source of these cytokines. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1994;10:471–480.[Abstract]
  54. Jeffery PK, Godfrey RW, Adelroth E, Nelson F, Rogers A, Johansson SA. Effects of treatment on airway inflammation and thickening of basement membrane reticular collagen in asthma: a quantitative light and electron microscopic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:890–899.[Medline]
  55. Schleimer RP, Lichtenstein LM, Gillespie E. Inhibition of basophil histamine release by anti-inflammatory steroids. Nature 1981;292:454–455.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Schleimer RP, Schulman ES, MacGlashan DW Jr, Peters SP, Hayes EC, Adams GK III, Lichtenstein LM, Adkinson NF Jr. Effects of dexamethasone on mediator release from human lung fragments and purified human lung mast cells. J Clin Invest 1983;71:1830–1835.
  57. Schroeder JT, MacGlashan DW Jr, MacDonald SM, Kagey-Sobotka A, Lichtenstein LM. Regulation of IgE-dependent IL-4 generation by human basophils treated with glucocorticoids. J Immunol 1997;158:5448–5454.[Abstract]
  58. Liu MC, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM, Hubbard WC, Bochner BS, Stealey BA, Breslin L, Xiao H, Freidhoff LR, Schroeder JT, et al. Effects of prednisone on the cellular responses and release of cytokines and mediators after segmental allergen challenge of asthmatic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108:29–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Hattotuwa KL, Gizycki MJ, Ansari TW, Jeffery PK, Barnes NC. The effects of inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled biopsy study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1592–1596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Gizycki MJ, Hattotuwa KL, Barnes N, Jeffery PK. Effects of fluticasone propionate on inflammatory cells in COPD: an ultrastructural examination of endobronchial biopsy tissue. Thorax 2002;57:799–803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Culpitt SV, Rogers DF, Shah P, De Matos C, Russell RE, Donnelly LE, Barnes PJ. Impaired inhibition by dexamethasone of cytokine release by alveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:24–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Russell RE, Culpitt SV, DeMatos C, Donnelly L, Smith M, Wiggins J, Barnes PJ. Release and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 by alveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:602–609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Uller L, Persson CG, Kallstrom L, Erjefalt JS. Lung tissue eosinophils may be cleared through luminal entry rather than apoptosis: effects of steroid treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1948–1956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Eum SY, Maghni K, Hamid Q, Eidelman DH, Campbell H, Isogai S, Martin JG. Inhibition of allergic airways inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in mice by dexamethasone: role of eosinophils, IL-5, eotaxin, and IL-13. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:1049–1061.[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Haddad E, McCluskie K, Birrell MA, Dabrowski D, Pecoraro M, Underwood S, Chen B, De Sanctis GT, Webber SE, Foster ML, et al. Differential effects of ebselen on neutrophil recruitment, chemokine, and inflammatory mediator expression in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation. J Immunol 2002;169:974–982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Haddad EB, Birrell M, McCluskie K, Ling A, Webber SE, Foster ML, Belvisi MG. Role of p38 MAP kinase in LPS-induced airway inflammation in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 2001;132:1715–1724.[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Rocksen D, Lilliehook B, Larsson R, Johansson T, Bucht A. Differential anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of dexamethasone and N-acetylcysteine in endotoxin-induced lung inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol 2000;122:249–256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Fitzgerald M. Efficacy of the PDE 4 inhibitor, BAY 19–8004 and a steroid in tobacco smoke-induced models of pulmonary inflammation in the mouse [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:A035.
  69. Choe KH, Taraseviciene-Stewart L, Scerbavicius R, Gera L, Tuder RM, Voelkel NF. Methylprednisolone causes matrix metalloproteinasedependent emphysema in adult rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:1516–1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Barnes PJ, Pedersen S, Busse WW. Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids: new developments. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:S1–53.[Free Full Text]
  71. O'Connor BJ, Ridge SM, Barnes PJ, Fuller RW. Greater effect of inhaled budesonide on adenosine 5'-monophosphate-induced than on sodium-metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:560–564.[Medline]
  72. Vathenen AS, Knox AJ, Wisniewski A, Tattersfield AE. Effect of inhaled budesonide on bronchial reactivity to histamine, exercise, and eucapnic dry air hyperventilation in patients with asthma. Thorax 1991;46:811–816.[Abstract]
  73. Henriksen JM, Dahl R. Effects of inhaled budesonide alone and in combination with low-dose terbutaline in children with exercise-induced asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:993–997.[Medline]
  74. Bentley AM, Hamid Q, Robinson DS, Schotman E, Meng Q, Assoufi B, Kay AB, Durham SR. Prednisolone treatment in asthma: reduction in the numbers of eosinophils, T cells, tryptase-only positive mast cells, and modulation of IL-4, IL-5, and interferon-gamma cytokine gene expression within the bronchial mucosa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:551–556.[Abstract]
  75. Laitinen LA, Laitinen A, Heino M, Haahtela T. Eosinophilic airway inflammation during exacerbation of asthma and its treatment with inhaled corticosteroid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:423–427.[Medline]
  76. Chanez P, Vignola AM, O'Shaugnessy T, Enander I, Li D, Jeffery PK, Bousquet J. Corticosteroid reversibility in COPD is related to features of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1529–1534.[Abstract]
  77. Jatakanon A, Lim S, Barnes PJ. Changes in sputum eosinophils predict loss of asthma control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:64–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Marom Z, Shelhamer JH, Bach MK, Morton DR, Kaliner M. Slow-reacting substances, leukotrienes C4 and D4, increase the release of mucus from human airways in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:449–451.[Medline]
  79. Dahlen SE, Bjork J, Hedqvist P, Arfors KE, Hammarstrom S, Lindgren JA, Samuelsson B. Leukotrienes promote plasma leakage and leukocyte adhesion in postcapillary venules: in vivo effects with relevance to the acute inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:3887–3891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Dahlen SE, Hedqvist P, Hammarstrom S, Samuelsson B. Leukotrienes are potent constrictors of human bronchi. Nature 1980;288:484–486.[CrossRef][Medline]
  81. Sebaldt RJ, Sheller JR, Oates JA, Roberts LJ, Fitzgerald GA. Inhibition of eicosanoid biosynthesis by glucocorticoids in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6974–6978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Manso G, Baker AJ, Taylor IK, Fuller RW. In vivo and in vitro effects of glucocorticosteroids on arachidonic acid metabolism and monocyte function in nonasthmatic humans. Eur Respir J 1992;5:712–716.[Abstract]
  83. O'Shaughnessy KM, Wellings R, Gillies B, Fuller RW. Differential effects of fluticasone propionate on allergen-evoked bronchoconstriction and increased urinary leukotriene E4 excretion. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:1472–1476.[Medline]
  84. Dworski R, Fitzgerald GA, Oates JA, Sheller JR. Effect of oral prednisone on airway inflammatory mediators in atopic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:953–959.[Abstract]
  85. Belvisi MG, Brown TJ, Wicks S, Foster ML. New glucocorticosteroids with an improved therapeutic ratio? Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2001;14:221–227.[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. Barnes PJ. Therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Ther 2003;97:87–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Brightling CE, Monteiro W, Ward R, Parker D, Morgan MD, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Sputum eosinophilia and short-term response to prednisolone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:1480–1485.[CrossRef][Medline]
  88. Vestbo J, Sorensen T, Lange P, Brix A, Torre P, Viskum K. Long-term effect of inhaled budesonide in mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1819–1823.[CrossRef][Medline]
  89. Pauwels RA, Lofdahl CG, Laitinen LA, Schouten JP, Postma DS, Pride NB, Ohlsson SV. Long-term treatment with inhaled budesonide in persons with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who continue smoking. European Respiratory Society Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1948–1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Burge PS, Calverley PM, Jones PW, Spencer S, Anderson JA, Maslen TK. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000;320:1297–1303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Lung Health Study Research Group. Effect of inhaled triamcinolone on the decline in pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1902–1909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Alsaeedi A, Sin DD, McAlister FA. The effects of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Am J Med 2002;113:59–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  93. Davies L, Angus RM, Calverley PM. Oral corticosteroids in patients admitted to hospital with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 354:456–460.[CrossRef][Medline]
  94. Culpitt SV, Maziak W, Loukidis S, Nightingale JA, Matthews JL, Barnes PJ. Effect of high dose inhaled steroid on cells, cytokines, and proteases in induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1635–1639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Menge and E. A. Dean-Nystrom
Dexamethasone Depletes {gamma}{delta}T Cells and Alters the Activation State and Responsiveness of Bovine Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subpopulations
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2284 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L.-b. Li, D. Y. M. Leung, M. J. Strand, and E. Goleva
ATF2 impairs glucocorticoid receptor mediated transactivation in human CD8+ T cells
Blood, September 1, 2007; 110(5): 1570 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. ten Hove, L. A. Houben, J. A. M. Raaijmakers, L. Koenderman, and M. Bracke
Rapid Selective Priming of Fc{alpha}R on Eosinophils by Corticosteroids
J. Immunol., November 1, 2006; 177(9): 6108 - 6114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belvisi, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belvisi, M. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK