Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 4:606-610 (2007)
© 2007 The American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1513/pats.200707-086TH

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabroe, I.
Right arrow Articles by Whyte, M. K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabroe, I.
Right arrow Articles by Whyte, M. K. B.

Practical and Conceptual Models of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Ian Sabroe1, Lisa C. Parker1, Steven K. Dower1 and Moira K. B. Whyte1

1 Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Section of Infection, Inflammation, and Immunity, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Ian Sabroe, Ph.D., F.R.C.P., Academic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, L Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. E-mail: i.sabroe{at}sheffield.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

The challenges of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the difficulties in modeling its pathology in vitro and in vivo are substantial. Integration of innate- and adaptive-type responses with processes of scarring and healing do not fit comfortably with some definitions of the immune system, and, instead, this disease is an exemplar of a network-based system that we have named "contiguous immunity." The complicated and highly interconnected networks underpinning many biological processes show features of scale-free networks. Consideration of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathology as a scale-free network showing features of contiguous immunity might, in the future, aid identification and targeting of potential key "hubs"—these being principal components of the disease network—manipulation of which may yield successful new therapies.

Key Words: inflammation • innate immunity • COPD

The long chronicity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), its multifactorial and polygenic nature, and the relative inaccessibility of the human lung for experimental approaches conspire to make this disease a challenging entity with respect to understanding the pathology and developing new therapies. Despite these substantial difficulties, we now know a considerable amount about processes active in COPD (1), and etiological models have been advanced that focus on, for example, protease activity, oxidative stress, and inflammation (2). It is evident and clearly understood that these complex processes cannot happen in isolation, but, despite this, we have as yet only limited understanding of the nature of the networks that underpin inflammatory lung diseases, such as COPD. In a recent series of articles, we have begun to try to find other ways to describe these networks and consider how an understanding of such systems might be applied to inflammatory lung diseases (35). In particular, we have proposed a concept of "contiguous immunity" to describe the involvement of the immune system in chronic disease (4), and have begun to extend this concept to consider contiguous immunity as a scale-free network (5). The concept of contiguous immunity seeks to invoke a notion of continual dialog between the many components of the immune system (such as innate and adaptive responses). Scale-free networks are common in biology (6), and provide a way of describing the organization of linkages between pathway components. By way of illustration, the World Wide Web or local computer networks are organized as scale-free networks, in which some components are highly connected (imagine a central computer server providing a core component of Web traffic), whereas some components (e.g., your own laptop) are connected to only one or two other machines directly. Thinking of networks in these forms may help us to identify the key hubs in disease—these being points in a network that, if targeted, may have profound impacts on a pathological process. These concepts, we argue, provide some new ways in which to consider the pathology of COPD.

CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPTUAL NETWORKS MIGHT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE NEW THERAPEUTIC DIRECTIONS

Processes of immunity have traditionally been grouped into either innate or adaptive arms. This nomenclature describes two very different aspects to the immune system, with different functions. Innate immunity also embraces concepts of nonimmunological protection, such as the barrier function of epithelia. A final outcome of a successful immune response is wound healing, and, although these processes are part of the inflammatory response, abnormal fibroblast function may underpin interstitial lung diseases in a way that may not be directly dependent on the actions of the immune system (7). Many chronic diseases are thus surprisingly hard to fit into classical categories of immunity. Despite these difficulties, there is still a tendency to view diseases as being principally characterized by activation of innate or adaptive immunity, and by virtue of this definition, to risk failing to appreciate the dialog between these processes.

It is also apparent that inflammatory processes function as networks. All physicians and scientists are familiar with networks, because the interconnected maps of signal transduction or cellular metabolism are all illustrations of these. The challenges facing biomedical scientists include the identification of the components of these networks, and the determination of which points are amenable to therapeutic targeting to generate drugs that are ideally both effective and specific.

We have begun to try to define some of the ways in which cells communicate to generate inflammatory responses by using simple models in which leukocytes and tissue cells are studied in coculture. To date, we have focused on those mechanisms contributing to effective responses to pathogens, which are also potentially involved in the responses to inhaled dusts and pollutants. Using generation of proinflammatory cytokines as a simple marker of the inflammatory response, we have found that maximal responses to a wide range of microbial agonists, including bacterial LPS (8), bacterial-type lipoproteins (8), flagellin (unpublished observations), and drugs acting on the antiviral receptors, Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and TLR8 (9), all exert maximal responses only when leukocytes and tissue cells act together as a network. The central component of this network is a direct activation of monocytes by these agonists, causing the release of IL-1β, which switches tissue cells into a proinflammatory state, resulting in generation of large amounts of cytokine (8, 9). Although IL-1 is necessary for this response, it appears insufficient to explain the magnitude of observed cytokine generation, suggesting that other factors, which are yet to be identified, are important in effective communication between leukocytes and tissue cells (8). Interestingly, we have recently shown that optimal responses are also, in some circumstances, dependent upon the tissue cell, with feedback from the tissue cell also regulating the function of the monocyte (unpublished data).

The very simple models we describe above may relate best to initiation of inflammation and responses to acute infections and damage. In chronic disease, repeated cycles of inflammation drive not a linear process, but a network in which continual dialog occurs between different cells. Inevitably, repeated rounds of activation of the innate immune system, antigen presentation, monocyte-dependent T-cell activation, chronic chemokine production, and so forth, will generate a dialog that encompasses innate and adaptive immune responses and processes of scarring and healing. Different local microenvironments within an organ are likely to, at any given time, show different aspects of inflammation, immunity, and repair. We have coined the term contiguous immunity to describe this network, in which multiple components of the immune system are in continual communication (4). Contiguous immunity specifically incorporates innate and adaptive immune processes and emphasizes their coexistence in disease.

Targeting these networks can be remarkably challenging. The very fact of our general maintenance of a reasonable state of function over our lifetimes, despite the many challenges of microbial pathology and toxic environmental stimuli that we face, suggests that the networks that keep us healthy must be remarkably robust and very stable (5). Although consecutive exposures cause these networks to refine themselves over time (10), this probably further serves to increase their stability. Given the stability of such systems, we have argued that both the states of health and the states of disease are likely to be actively maintained, stable conditions (5). Identifying which points of the network have central roles in the maintenance of these stable states may therefore turn out to be crucial for the development of effective therapies. This is particularly challenging, because outcomes in one disease cannot be readily carried over to predict responses in another, as illustrated by the targeting of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} and its success in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis, but its poorer results in sepsis, COPD, and vasculitis (1113). Even where treatments are successful there are variations between patients that are poorly understood, as shown in RA where about 30–40% of patients show no response to neutralization of TNF-{alpha}. Likewise, neutralizing IL-1 is effective in some arthritides but not others (1416).

The complex systems underpinning chronic disease also show characteristics of scale-free networks (5, 6). In scale-free systems, connectedness of components (nodes) follows a power law, in which some components are highly connected, whereas many components have a much lower level of connectivity (6). An approximately scale-free network model of COPD is illustrated in Figure 1. Analogous to the network of the World Wide Web, most components of these networks are not highly connected, with function of the network depending on a few highly connected hubs. Thus, it might be true that the target for investigational medicine is to identify and distinguish hubs (such as key cytokines or cell types) from components of diseases that are effectively peripheral nodes on the network. Arguably, eosinophil recruitment in asthma represents a peripheral node, targeting of which has little outcome overall on disease progression, even if lung eosinophilia is a useful biomarker of disease phenotype and severity (17). In RA, TNF-{alpha} clearly represents a hub for the majority of patients, but identifying the equivalent hubs in COPD is proving to be a substantial challenge.


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The figure illustrates some of the potential components of the pathological matrix of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), displayed in the form of an approximately scale-free network. The importance and place of many mediators and subsystems is yet to be determined; therefore, this is not intended to be a definitive statement of COPD pathology or to specifically rank the importance of individual processes, nor is it intended to accurately define all their linkages. Rather, the nature of a scale-free network is shown, reinforcing the fact that identification of appropriate points for therapeutic intervention might be facilitated by a detailed understanding of those network components that are potentially the most connected. In this scheme, peripheral nodes are represented by unfilled circles. Processes, mediators, or systems that may be evident in disease, but the neutralization of which has relatively little impact on disease overall, could be considered to be represented by these nodes. Depth of shading in red indicates the degree of connectivity of potential disease hubs—these being points at which therapeutic intervention might have substantial therapeutic consequences. Hubs may vary from patient to patient, and within one patient at different phases of the disease. For example, IL-1 might perhaps play a pivotal role in acute exacerbations of COPD, but may have less of a role in established chronic disease (see text). The potential hub that is tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} generation is shown in blue, because recent studies using anti–TNF-{alpha} strategies have been less efficacious than was hoped, and its exact role and place in disease remains to be established. Exogenous stimuli that drive or initiate inflammation are shown in green (adapted by permission from Reference 5).

 
Although the concept of important connected hubs and less important peripheral nodes is likely to be of value, it should be noted that, if clinically meaningful outcomes of a pathological process are dominated by one system component only, then intervening at a more peripheral point in the network may be effective. Identifying key therapeutic targets in COPD—these principally being disease hubs, but also potentially critical subsystems or nodes—is dependent on developing a detailed understanding of the pathological processes of COPD, as well as a series of integrated models of varying complexity in which to investigate their roles, before and potentially alongside experimental approaches.

INNATE IMMUNITY AND COMPONENTS OF THE COPD PATHOLOGICAL NETWORK

It is interesting to speculate further on the potential components of the disease network underpinning COPD. The pathogenesis of COPD has for many years been strongly linked to the inflammatory effects of cigarette smoke on cells within the lung (18). More recently, other studies have demonstrated high levels of LPS in cigarette tobacco and biologically active LPS in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke (19), providing a further mechanism by which TLRs can perpetuate the chronic inflammation of COPD. To drive transition from a healthy steady state to one of disease, the antiinflammatory effects of the epithelium must be overcome. Goblet cells produce mucus that traps bacteria and inhaled particulates found in pollution and cigarette smoke, whereas epithelial cells secrete antiproteases, antioxidants, and defensins, which act as antimicrobial products and are involved in tissue repair processes. Patients with COPD show increased susceptibility to bacterial infections, the mechanisms and underlying pathologic abnormalities of which are poorly understood, but may be related to altered TLR expression on cells within the lung (2022). As we and others have shown, the extensive expression of TLRs on cells within the lung enables responses to multiple damage and pathogen-related stimuli (8, 9, 23), providing ample opportunity to shape lung inflammation during COPD. Thus, as described previously here, the underlying inflammatory mechanisms involved in COPD involve both resident structural cells of the lung, such as epithelial cells, and recruited inflammatory cells, such as macrophages, T and B lymphocytes, and neutrophils. All of these cell types have the capacity to release abundant inflammatory mediators and participate in the resulting pathological network (1).

Although epithelial activation is clearly likely to be central to the pathology of COPD, it is interesting to consider how this might be mediated. The unsurprising ability of multiple mediators to activate epithelial cells needs to be balanced against the more interesting observation that chronic LPS exposure originating from cigarette smoke may also desensitize the lung's response to some pathogenic stimuli, further illustrating the complexity of in vivo networks (24). Furthermore, although most studies have investigated activity of the epithelium in isolation, we have shown that activation of the epithelium by pathogenic stimuli is typically dramatically greater when the epithelial cells are in coculture with leukocytes (9). These results have also been seen by other groups using epithelial cells derived from the lung and other organs (2531). This network, which has presumably evolved to maintain health through the effective removal of pathogens, has as its antithesis a potential perpetuation of inflammation in the presence of chronic, prolonged insults, such as those observed with cigarette smoking. Furthermore, this generic mechanism extends to other structural lung cells, because collaborative signaling to inflammatory stimuli, such as TLR activators, occurs in cocultures of leukocytes with epithelial cells, airway and vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells (23, 25, 26, 28, 3133). Further engagement of other network components results from these inflammatory processes. By way of illustration, CXCL8 is a potent neutrophil attractant, up-regulated in sputa from patients with COPD (34), the release of which from airway epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages can be triggered by multiple stimuli, including cigarette smoke extract, oxidative stress, LPS, viruses, and air pollutants, such as diesel exhaust particles (3538). CXCL8 generation results in neutrophil recruitment and protease delivery (2), but, inevitably, many other chemokines play a role in COPD, including CXCL1, CXCL10, and CCL2, which show varying attractant properties for monocytes, T lymphocytes, basophils, and neutrophils (3942). Increased numbers of all of these circulating inflammatory cells have been reported in the lungs and sputum of patients with COPD (4345). These chemokine networks provide for a complex linkage between innate and adaptive immunity (46), which is likely to be essential in the explanation of CD8+ T-cell recruitment and activation. The recruitment of CD8+ T cells, B cells, and the suggestion of autoimmune components to the pathology of COPD (45, 47, 48) again emphasize the network of COPD as one to which the concept of contiguous immunity applies well.

TNF-{alpha} and IL-1β have been thought to potentially have pivotal roles in amplifying the inflammation observed in COPD, activating infiltrating monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, as well as resident epithelial and endothelial cells. TNF-{alpha} also causes enhanced mucus secretion and the release of proteases, including neutrophil elastase (NE) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, resulting in destruction of the lung parenchyma (49, 50). Additional roles of IL-1β include induction of neutrophil release from bone marrow, fibroblast proliferation, increased synthesis of fibronectin and collagen, and enhanced collagenase and prostaglandin secretion (51, 52). Overexpression of IL-1 can cause emphysema and airway remodeling (51). TNF-{alpha} and IL-1β both induce intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on endothelial cells (53), allowing further recruitment of circulating leukocytes. However, neutralization of TNF-{alpha} has not proved successful in COPD therapy to date, and the therapeutic potential of IL-1 targeting remains to be established. Growth factors are responsible for many of the structural changes observed in the small airways and lung parenchyma during COPD through induction of fibrosis and cell proliferation. Their activation inevitably is part of networked inflammation. For example, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β activation, with its known downstream effects on fibrosis through the release of collagen tissue growth factor also activates MMP-9, resulting in increased neutrophil recruitment via MMP-9–generated chemokines. Because MMP-9 also converts latent TGF-β to its active form, a feedback loop is created with a potentially highly destructive outcome (54, 55). MMP-9 can also cause inactivation of {alpha}1-antitrypsin, an endogenous antiprotease, thus enhancing the effects of proteases, such as NE, and potentiating alveolar destruction and, thus, emphysema. The protease/antiprotease subsystem is likely to be an important component of the COPD network, whereby there is a disease-related imbalance between antiproteases (such as {alpha}1-antitrypsin, elafin, secretory leukoprotease inhibitor, and tissue inhibitor of MMPs) and proteases (such as NE, cathepsins, and MMPs [1, 2, 9, 12]) in favor of increased proteolysis (2). Much work has focused on NE (a serine protease stored in neutrophil granules), revealing proinflammatory effects, such as its ability to potently induce mucus secretion (56, 57) and expression of cytokines, such as CXCL8, in airway epithelial cells (58). NE has also been associated with regulatory effects on LPS responses, including induction of CXCL8 production via TLR4 (59), and up-regulation of LPS-induced chemokine production and increased expression of TLR4 on monocytes (60), but also inducing inactivation of CD14 (61). Caution is always needed in interpretation of TLR4 signaling of candidate agonists because of problems with LPS contamination (62), but these data nonetheless speak to complex feedback loops and a contiguous network.

CONCLUSIONS: MODELING AND EXPLOITING NETWORKS

Approaches to COPD need to deal with several problems. Studies of mechanisms need to interdigitate with observations of pathology, and strategies need to strongly incorporate work on human tissues, as this chronic disease is hard to model and there are problems with translation of murine models (3); however, murine models provide powerful tools for the dissection of molecular mechanisms of COPD (63). Increasingly complex approaches to modeling human tissues in vitro, coupled with mouse models and information from accurate disease phenotyping, are all required to successfully target COPD and other chronic diseases (3). Our conjecture is that finding new ways of thinking about the nature of COPD pathology may be of use in the investigation of the mechanisms of this disease. We would argue that identification of network components and their organization may facilitate the targeting of key system hubs: importantly, these are likely to vary within a disease over time, as it evolves chronically, and acutely during exacerbations; phenotypic disease variations between patients are also undoubtedly important. By way of illustration, we have argued that targeting IL-1 may be particularly useful in acute exacerbations of airway disease (4). At the least, we suggest that the act of considering the nature of the pathology of COPD, and the networks that underpin it, using concepts such as we have described above, can provide a stimulating environment within which to frame hypotheses and research questions for a very challenging disease.

FOOTNOTES

Supported by MRC Senior Clinical Fellowship G116/170 (I.S.).

Conflict of Interest Statement: I.S. has received support from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and AstraZeneca for conference attendance, and has received lecture fees from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. He received travel costs and lecture fees from AstraZeneca with respect to the Lund COPD meeting that generated this publication. L.C.P. does not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript. S.K.D. is currently a visiting scientist at CSL Ltd./University of Melbourne—supported by CSL Ltd.. CSL Ltd. has a general interest in immunotherapies, vaccines, and inflammation. He is in receipt of 10 months per annum salary support from CSL Ltd. as a visitor to Australia under a 457 visa, and is part time at the University of Sheffield. M.K.B.W. has received a small research grant from GSK, relating to a multicenter asthma genetics study. She has received support from Boehringer Ingelheim for conference attendance and small lecture fees from AstraZeneca.

(Received in original form July 2, 2007; accepted in final form August 15, 2007)

REFERENCES

  1. Barnes PJ. Mediators of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Rev 2004;56:515–548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. MacNee W. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005;2:258–266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sabroe I, Dockrell DH, Vogel SN, Renshaw SA, Whyte MK, Dower SK. Identifying and hurdling obstacles to translational research. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7:77–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sabroe I, Parker LC, Dockrell DH, Davies DE, Dower SK, Whyte MK. Pulmonary perspective: targeting the networks that underpin contiguous immunity in asthma and COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:306–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sabroe I, Parker LC, Calverley PMA, Dower SK, Whyte MKB. Pathological networking: a new approach to understanding COPD. Thorax 2007;62:733–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Albert R. Scale-free networks in cell biology. J Cell Sci 2005;118:4947–4957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wells AU, Hogaboam CM. Update in diffuse parenchymal lung disease 2006. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:655–660.[Free Full Text]
  8. Morris GE, Whyte MKB, Martin GF, Jose PJ, Dower SK, Sabroe I. Agonists of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 activate airway smooth muscle via mononuclear leukocytes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:814–822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Morris GE, Parker LC, Ward JR, Jones EC, Whyte MK, Brightling CE, Bradding P, Dower SK, Sabroe I. Cooperative molecular and cellular networks regulate Toll-like receptor–dependent inflammatory responses. FASEB J 2006;20:2153–2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Williams AE, Edwards L, Humphreys IR, Snelgrove R, Rae A, Rappuoli R, Hussell T. Innate imprinting by the modified heat-labile toxin of Escherichia coli (LTK63) provides generic protection against lung infectious disease. J Immunol 2004;173:7435–7443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Feldmann M, Pusey CD. Is there a role for TNF-{alpha} in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis? Lessons from other chronic inflammatory diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:1243–1252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rennard SI, Fogarty C, Kelsen S, Long W, Ramsdell J, Allison J, Mahler D, Saadeh C, Siler T, Snell P, et al. The safety and efficacy of infliximab in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;179:926–934.
  13. van der Vaart H, Koeter GH, Postma DS, Kauffman HF, ten Hacken NH. First study of infliximab treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:465–469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Burger D, Dayer JM, Palmer G, Gabay C. Is IL-1 a good therapeutic target in the treatment of arthritis? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:879–896.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Hawkins PN, Lachmann HJ, Aganna E, McDermott MF. Spectrum of clinical features in Muckle-Wells syndrome and response to anakinra. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:607–612.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Reiff A. The use of anakinra in juvenile arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2005;7:434–440.[Medline]
  17. Green RH, Brightling CE, McKenna S, Hargadon B, Parker D, Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:1715–1721.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Fletcher C, Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ 1977;1:1645–1648.[Medline]
  19. Hasday JD, Bascom R, Costa JJ, Fitzgerald T, Dubin W. Bacterial endotoxin is an active component of cigarette smoke. Chest 1999;115:829–835.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Droemann D, Goldmann T, Tiedje T, Zabel P, Dalhoff K, Schaaf B. Toll-like receptor 2 expression is decreased on alveolar macrophages in cigarette smokers and COPD patients. Respir Res 2005;6:68.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Pons J, Sauleda J, Regueiro V, Santos C, Lopez M, Ferrer J, Agusti AG, Bengoechea JA. Expression of Toll-like receptor 2 is up-regulated in monocytes from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2006;7:64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Papi A, Bellettato CM, Braccioni F, Romagnoli M, Casolari P, Caramori G, Fabbri LM, Johnston SL. Infections and airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severe exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1114–1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hollingsworth JW, Chen BJ, Brass DM, Berman K, Gunn MD, Cook DN, Schwartz DA. The critical role of hematopoietic cells in lipopolysaccharide-induced airway inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:806–813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Medvedev AE, Sabroe I, Hasday JD, Vogel SN. Tolerance to microbial TLR ligands: molecular mechanisms and relevance to disease. J Endotoxin Res 2006;12:133–150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Cerri C, Chimenti D, Conti I, Neri T, Paggiaro P, Celi A. Monocyte/macrophage-derived microparticles up-regulate inflammatory mediator synthesis by human airway epithelial cells. J Immunol 2006;177:1975–1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ishii H, Hayashi S, Hogg JC, Fujii T, Goto Y, Sakamoto N, Mukae H, Vincent R, van Eeden SF. Alveolar macrophage-epithelial cell interaction following exposure to atmospheric particles induces the release of mediators involved in monocyte mobilization and recruitment. Respir Res 2005;6:87.[Medline]
  27. Krakauer T. Stimulant-dependent modulation of cytokines and chemokines by airway epithelial cells: cross talk between pulmonary epithelial and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002;9:126–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Liu L, Roberts AA, Ganz T. By IL-1 signaling, monocyte-derived cells dramatically enhance the epidermal antimicrobial response to lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol 2003;170:575–580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Pioli PA, Weaver LK, Schaefer TM, Wright JA, Wira CR, Guyre PM. Lipopolysaccharide-induced il-1β production by human uterine macrophages up-regulates uterine epithelial cell expression of human β-defensin 2. J Immunol 2006;176:6647–6655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. van Wetering S, Tjabringa GS, Hiemstra PS. Interactions between neutrophil-derived antimicrobial peptides and airway epithelial cells. J Leukoc Biol 2005;77:444–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wharram BL, Fitting K, Kunkel SL, Remick DG, Merritt SE, Wiggins RC. Tissue factor expression in endothelial cell/monocyte cocultures stimulated by lipopolysaccharide and/or aggregated IgG: mechanisms of cell:cell communication. J Immunol 1991;146:1437–1445.[Abstract]
  32. Borregaard N, Theilgaard-Monch K, Cowland JB, Stahle M, Sorensen OE. Neutrophils and keratinocytes in innate immunity–cooperative actions to provide antimicrobial defense at the right time and place. J Leukoc Biol 2005;77:439–443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Noulin N, Quesniaux VF, Schnyder-Candrian S, Schnyder B, Maillet I, Robert T, Vargaftig BB, Ryffel B, Couillin I. Both hemopoietic and resident cells are required for MyD88-dependent pulmonary inflammatory response to inhaled endotoxin. J Immunol 2005;175:6861–6869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Keatings VM, Collins PD, Scott DM, Barnes PJ. Differences in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:530–534.[Abstract]
  35. DeForge LE, Preston AM, Takeuchi E, Kenney J, Boxer LA, Remick DG. Regulation of interleukin 8 gene expression by oxidant stress. J Biol Chem 1993;268:25568–25576.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Johnston SL, Papi A, Bates PJ, Mastronarde JG, Monick MM, Hunninghake GW. Low grade rhinovirus infection induces a prolonged release of IL-8 in pulmonary epithelium. J Immunol 1998;160:6172–6181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Roos-Engstrand E, Wallin A, Bucht A, Pourazar J, Sandstrom T, Blomberg A. Increased expression of p38 MAPK in human bronchial epithelium after lipopolysaccharide exposure. Eur Respir J 2005;25:797–803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Steerenberg PA, Zonnenberg JA, Dormans JA, Joon PN, Wouters IM, van Bree L, Scheepers PT, Van Loveren H. Diesel exhaust particles induced release of interleukin 6 and 8 by (primed) human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS 2B) in vitro. Exp Lung Res 1998;24:85–100.[Medline]
  39. Capelli A, Di Stefano A, Gnemmi I, Balbo P, Cerutti CG, Balbi B, Lusuardi M, Donner CF. Increased MCP-1 and MIP-1β in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of chronic bronchitics. Eur Respir J 1999;14:160–165.[Abstract]
  40. de Boer WI, Sont JK, van Schadewijk A, Stolk J, van Krieken JH, Hiemstra PS. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, interleukin 8, and chronic airways inflammation in COPD. J Pathol 2000;190:619–626.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Geiser T, Dewald B, Ehrengruber MU, Clark-Lewis I, Baggiolini M. The interleukin-8–related chemotactic cytokines GRO {alpha}, GRO β, and GRO {gamma} activate human neutrophil and basophil leukocytes. J Biol Chem 1993;268:15419–15424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Saetta M, Mariani M, Panina-Bordignon P, Turato G, Buonsanti C, Baraldo S, Bellettato CM, Papi A, Corbetta L, Zuin R, et al. Increased expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligand CXCL10 in peripheral airways of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1404–1409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. O'Donnell R, Breen D, Wilson S, Djukanovic R. Inflammatory cells in the airways in COPD. Thorax 2006;61:448–454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Retamales I, Elliott WM, Meshi B, Coxson HO, Pare PD, Sciurba FC, Rogers RM, Hayashi S, Hogg JC. Amplification of inflammation in emphysema and its association with latent adenoviral infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:469–473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, Cherniack RM, Rogers RM, Sciurba FC, Coxson HO, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2645–2653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Sabroe I, Lloyd CM, Whyte MK, Dower SK, Williams TJ, Pease JE. Chemokines, innate and adaptive immunity, and respiratory disease. Eur Respir J 2002;19:350–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Agusti A, MacNee W, Donaldson K, Cosio M. Hypothesis: does COPD have an autoimmune component? Thorax 2003;58:832–834.[Free Full Text]
  48. Taraseviciene-Stewart L, Douglas IS, Nana-Sinkam PS, Lee JD, Tuder RM, Nicolls MR, Voelkel NF. Is alveolar destruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease an immune disease? Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:687–690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Chung KF. Cytokines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J Suppl 2001;34:50s–59s.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Churg A, Wang RD, Tai H, Wang X, Xie C, Dai J, Shapiro SD, Wright JL. Macrophage metalloelastase mediates acute cigarette smoke–induced inflammation via tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} release. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1083–1089.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Lappalainen U, Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Tichelaar JW, Bry K. Interleukin-1β causes pulmonary inflammation, emphysema, and airway remodeling in the adult murine lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005;32:311–318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Russell RE, Culpitt SV, DeMatos C, Donnelly L, Smith M, Wiggins J, Barnes PJ. Release and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 by alveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002;26:602–609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Haraldsen G, Kvale D, Lien B, Farstad IN, Brandtzaeg P. Cytokine-regulated expression of E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in human microvascular endothelial cells. J Immunol 1996;156:2558–2565.[Abstract]
  54. Ihn H. Pathogenesis of fibrosis: role of TGF-β and CTGF. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:681–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Yu Q, Stamenkovic I. Cell surface–localized matrix metalloproteinase-9 proteolytically activates TGF-β and promotes tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Genes Dev 2000;14:163–176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Sommerhoff CP, Nadel JA, Basbaum CB, Caughey GH. Neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G stimulate secretion from cultured bovine airway gland serous cells. J Clin Invest 1990;85:682–689.[Medline]
  57. Takeyama K, Agusti C, Ueki I, Lausier J, Cardell LO, Nadel JA. Neutrophil-dependent goblet cell degranulation: role of membrane-bound elastase and adhesion molecules. Am J Physiol 1998;275:L294–L302.[Medline]
  58. Nakamura H, Yoshimura K, McElvaney NG, Crystal RG. Neutrophil elastase in respiratory epithelial lining fluid of individuals with cystic fibrosis induces interleukin-8 gene expression in a human bronchial epithelial cell line. J Clin Invest 1992;89:1478–1484.[Medline]
  59. Devaney JM, Greene CM, Taggart CC, Carroll TP, O'Neill SJ, McElvaney NG. Neutrophil elastase up-regulates interleukin-8 via toll-like receptor 4. FEBS Lett 2003;544:129–132.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Tsujimoto H, Ono S, Majima T, Kawarabayashi N, Takayama E, Kinoshita M, Seki S, Hiraide H, Moldawer LL, Mochizuki H. Neutrophil elastase, MIP-2, and TLR-4 expression during human and experimental sepsis. Shock 2005;23:39–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Le-Barillec K, Si-Tahar M, Balloy V, Chignard M. Proteolysis of monocyte CD14 by human leukocyte elastase inhibits lipopolysaccharide-mediated cell activation. J Clin Invest 1999;103:1039–1046.[Medline]
  62. Wakelin SJ, Sabroe I, Gregory CD, Poxton IR, Forsythe JL, Garden OJ, Howie SE. "Dirty little secrets": endotoxin contamination of recombinant proteins. Immunol Lett 2006;106:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Mahadeva R, Shapiro SD. Animal models of pulmonary emphysema. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 2005;4:665–673.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabroe, I.
Right arrow Articles by Whyte, M. K. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabroe, I.
Right arrow Articles by Whyte, M. K. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS