Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 5:323-327 (2008)
© 2008 The American Thoracic Society
doi: 10.1513/pats.200712-169DR

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krause, D. S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krause, D. S.

Bone Marrow–derived Cells and Stem Cells in Lung Repair

Diane S. Krause1

1 Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Diane S. Krause, M.D., Ph.D., Yale University, 333 Cedar St, Stem Cell Program, PO Box 208073, New Haven, CT 06520-8073. E-mail: diane.krause{at}yale.edu

ABSTRACT

Although it has been many years since publication of the first peer-reviewed studies showing that bone marrow (BM)–derived cells can become mature-appearing epithelial cells, we still know very little regarding the mechanisms, kinetics, cells, and potential clinical utility or pathology associated with this phenomenon. The initial discovery of BM-derived epithelial cells (BMDE) in the liver was published by Petersen and colleagues (Petersen BE, Bowen WC, Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, Murase N, Boggs SS, Greenberger JS, Goff JP. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science 1999;284:1168–1170). Since that time, BMDE were identified in the skin, eye, GI tract, kidney, and the lung. Surprisingly, once several laboratories started to examine the effects of BM cells after tissue injury, BM-derived cells of different types were found to decrease tissue injury and enhance tissue repair, often without engraftment of marrow-derived epithelial cells. Thus, the potentially beneficial effects of BM-derived cells in some tissue microenvironments may be unrelated to differentiation into nonhematopoietic cell types. Here, I focus on recent findings from my laboratory as well as several other laboratories on the effects of BM cells on lung damage, and BMDE in the lung, including tracheal epithelial cells, bronchiolar epithelial cells, and type II pneumocytes in the alveoli. Potential mechanisms underlying the appearance of marrow-derived epithelial cells, and the role of tissue damage are discussed.

Key Words: stem cells • plasticity • tissue repair

TISSUE DAMAGE IS NECESSARY FOR APPEARANCE OF BONE MARROW–DERIVED EPITHELIAL CELLS IN THE LUNG

In many of the studies using bone marrow (BM) transplantation to study the BM to epithelial transition, BM-derived epithelial cells (BMDE) developed after some form of tissue injury. In the early studies, BM cells were transplanted into female mice that had undergone marrow-lethal whole body irradiation as a preparative regimen to promote BM engraftment, and, at least for engraftment of type II pneumocytes, the kinetics of appearance of BMDE coincided with the initial severe pneumonitis caused by high doses of radiation. The radiation level to which the mice were exposed (1,200 cGy) is known to cause severe lung injury characterized by breakdown of capillaries within alveolar septa and extravasation of erythrocytes into the alveolar spaces at about Day 3, worsening until Day 5, and then restoring alveolar septal integrity by about Day 7 (13). BMDE were first detectable in the damaged alveolar tissue 5 to 7 days after lethal irradiation, and clusters of BMDE were detectable in alveoli by 2 months and remained relatively constant thereafter (4). BMDE can also be obtained with sublethal (< 1,000 cGy) irradiation; however, the dose needs to be above a threshold that causes lung damage (5). We transplanted BM into recipients that had received a preparative regimen of 400, 600, or 1,000 cGy, and within 1 month, all of the mice had greater than 85% hematopoietic engraftment in the BM and peripheral blood. We found a strong correlation between lung damage and the presence of BMDE. In mice that were transplanted after receiving 400 or 600 cGy, hematopoietic engraftment was high (> 85%), but there was no lung injury, and no marrow-derived epithelial cells. In contrast, in the mice that received 1,000 cGy irradiation there was significant lung injury, and BM-derived cells did engraft as lung epithelial cells in addition to engrafting the hematopoietic system. These data indicate a critical role for lung injury in the phenotypic change from BM cells to lung epithelial cells.

DETERMINING WHICH BM SUBPOPULATIONS ARE ABLE TO ENGRAFT AS EPITHELIAL CELLS

It is not clear which BM subpopulation(s) is (are) capable of engraftment as epithelial cells. The BM contains at least two different populations of stem cells, each of which is capable of both self-renewal and differentiation down multiple lineages. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) can differentiate into all blood cell types. In mice and humans, multiple approaches have been used to isolate and characterize HSC. Many isolation protocols start with a lineage depletion step, in which all cells that have already committed to a specific hematopoietic lineage are removed using a cocktail of different antibodies against surface antigens that are expressed following commitment (e.g., Glycophorin A expression on cells committed to the erythroid lineage). Additional enrichment steps have included (1) exclusion of rhodamine and Hoechst dyes (6), (2) expression of Sca1 and Kit antigens (7), and (3) the ability of HSC to home rapidly to the BM after intravenous infusion (8).

In addition to HSC, BM contains marrow stromal cells, also known as mesenchymal stem cells (the acronym MSC can signify either nomenclature). A major limitation in this new field of BM to epithelial differentiation is the lack of characterization of cell population studies used in each study. No specific constellation of surface markers has been agreed upon for these cells. Based on commonalities among several different manuscripts (912), a consensus statement has been published suggesting that the constellation of surface antigens on MSC includes CD13, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD106, and CD124, and that these cells should not express CD45 (13). Although the term "MSC" is used by many different laboratories, the cells vary from one lab to another. Cells referred to as MSC share a minimum of three primary characteristics: they grow as adherent cells in tissue culture plates; have a finite lifespan of approximately 30 to 50 cell doublings; and they can differentiate, under appropriate specific in vitro conditions, into osteoblasts, chondroblasts, and adipocytes. Variations in approaches used to grow MSC have led to variable findings regarding the differentiation potential of these cells in different laboratories. Importantly, some published reports report only that they used adherent BM cells, and do not provide adequate characterization of the cells transplanted for one to know whether these cells were adherent hematopoietic cells (e.g., CD45+ macrophages), endothelial cells, fibroblasts, or a mixture of many cell types. These significant differences in study design and cell characterization likely underlie many of the apparent discrepancies in the literature. For example, some investigators report that MSC can differentiate in vitro into neuronal type cells, while others cannot obtain this phenotype (14). Several different laboratories have reported data suggesting that MSC or adherent cells grown from the BM can differentiate into multiple types of lung epithelial cells (Table 1) (1522). Others have reported not detecting BMDE in the lung (23, 24).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF PUBLICATIONS EXAMINING BONE MARROW–DERIVED EPITHELIAL CELLS IN THE LUNG

 
BM subpopulations that have been enriched using different approaches have been tested for their ability to engraft as lung epithelial cells in vivo. When very small (< 5 µm) BM cells are selected by elutriation (E), lineage depletion (L), and their ability to home (H) to the BM of a lethally irradiated host, the resulting population (called ELH) is greatly enriched for HSC (8). Like the lineage-negative, Sca+, Kit+ (LSK) population, a single ELH cell can provide long-term hematopoietic reconstitution in about 20% of lethally irradiated recipients (7, 25). We have shown that a single BM-derived cell can differentiate into both hematopoietic cells and lung epithelial cells in mice (25). We transplanted single male-derived ELH BM cells into lethally irradiated female mice. (Short-term hematopoietic reconstituting cells from female donors were co-transplanted with this single cell to allow the lethally irradiated recipients to survive.) In the mice that survived and achieved hematopoietic reconstitution from the single ELH cells, there were Y chromosome–positive (male-derived) cytokeratin-positive epithelial cells in the lung, thereby demonstrating that a single marrow-derived cell can engraft not only as blood but also as mature epithelial cells throughout the body. In an independent study using GFP to mark donor-derived BM cells, Wagers and coworkers (24) reported that when a single LSK cell engrafts the entire hematopoietic system, there are rare BM-derived hepatocytes in the liver, but no BM-derived epithelial cells were detected in the lung (24). There were several technical differences between the studies performed with ELH and LSK cells. Whether LSK and ELH have the same ability to become BMDE has not yet been directly tested. That is, these populations have not yet been tested side-by-side in the same experiment using identical mouse strains as well as methods for detection of BMDE.

POTENTIAL MECHANISMS BY WHICH BM CELLS TAKE ON THE GENE EXPRESSION PATTERN OF EPITHELIAL CELLS

There are several possible mechanisms for BMDC plasticity. One possibility is that BM cells that differentiate into epithelial cells represent a previously unsuspected population of highly pluripotent stem cells located in the BM that have not yet "committed" to becoming blood; that is, there may be cells that have the ability to self-renew, and to differentiate into hematopoietic stem cells and into epithelial cell lineages. There have been reports from several laboratories of highly pluripotent cells derived from the BM, including Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells (MAPC) reported by Jiang and colleagues (26), and Very Small Embryonic-Like cells (VSELs) reported by the laboratory of Dr. Mariusz Ratajczak (27, 28).

Alternatively, the cells that are responsible for BMDE are committed HSCs that can transdifferentiate. Transdifferentiation refers to the ability of one committed cell type to change its gene expression pattern to that of a completely different cell type without cell fusion. No data have been published that directly support this possibility.

A third mechanism for plasticity could be the fusion of a BM-derived cell with a nonhematopoietic cell to form a heterokaryon, thereby converting the gene expression pattern of the original BM cell to that of the fusion partner. Reprogramming of the gene expression program of fibroblasts after fusion with myoblasts to form a heterokaryons has long been known to result in the expression of muscle-specific mRNA by the fibroblast nuclei (29), and somatic cell nuclear transfer into unfertilized oocytes results in nearly complete reprogramming of somatic nuclei (30). There are elegant published data demonstrating that fusion of a macrophage, which would be BM derived, with an injured hepatocyte in vivo can lead to reprogramming of the macrophage nucleus so that it expresses what are considered to be liver-specific genes (31, 32). We have demonstrated that 20 to 50% of BMDE in the lung after BM transplantation are due to fusion (33). Thus, cell fusion has been proven to be at least one mechanism by which BMDE develop.

A fourth suggestion has been that a cell can acquire mRNA by taking up microvesicles containing mRNA from other cells (34). When the mRNA is released into the cytoplasm of the marrow-derived cells, one can detect not only this epithelial cell–specific mRNA, but protein translated from this mRNA (35). Uptake and expression of lung epithelial cell–derived mRNA by co-cultured BM-derived cells has been demonstrated (36). Lateral transfer of RNA has also been suggested by data obtained using xenogeneic transplantation of human BM cells into immunodeficient mice. In this work, human albumin was found in murine hepatocytes that did not contain human nuclear material, based on staining for human versus murine alu sequences. The authors suggest that this represents lateral gene transfer, which may have occurred when small fragments of human nuclei are retained after murine cells phagocytose deteriorating transplanted human cells (37).

A fifth possibility is that there are epithelial progenitor cells in the BM that are capable of engraftment as epithelial cells, but not as hematopoietic cells (3840). It is also possible, and in my opinion very likely, that engraftment of BMDE occurs via multiple different mechanisms.

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE ON BM-DERIVED LUNG EPITHELIAL CELLS

A summary of some of the published literature on BM-derived epithelial cells in the lung is shown in Table 1. (Note that this list is not exhaustive.) Studies have demonstrated the ability of MSC to take on the gene expression pattern of lung epithelial cells in vitro as well as after in vivo administration either intravenously or intratracheally. The in vitro studies always require co-culture of the MSC with lung epithelial cells, leaving open the possibility of microvesicles containing mRNA being taken up my the BM-derived cells, or even of contaminating mRNA in the RNA isolated from the BM-derived cells after their removal form the co-culture conditions.

In vivo studies have shown mixed results depending upon the cell population transplanted, the means of transplantation, the type of tissue damage induced, and the methods used to detect BM-derived cells. Kotton and coworkers (15) published their finding that β-galactosidase–expressing BM cells could become type I pneumocytes after intravenous infusion into mice whose lungs had been damaged with bleomycin. Similarly, Ortiz and colleagues (17) showed that intravenous administration of MSC to busulfan-injured mice led to engraftment of epithelial-like cells and also decreased busulfan-induced fibrotic injury to the lung. However, Kotton and colleagues found no BMDE in subsequent studies when they administered BM cells into irradiated mice (41), at which time they suggested that their original identification of β-galactosidase–expressing type I pneumocytes may have been due to staining artifact rather than the true appearance of BMDE. These authors are to be commended for this reconsideration, as much of the data so far published on BMDE is dependent on morphology alone, and the staining and resolution of the imaging techniques are not always optimized for definitive identification of BMDE in lung tissue. More definitive identification approaches have involved the use of confocal microscopy and also the identification of single individual BM-derived epithelial cells analyzed after digestion and isolation of purified cells from the tissues (33), which allows one to avoid the risk of misinterpretation of the data due to one cell overlapping another.

It is both surprising and potentially clinically relevant that administration of BM cells can decrease tissue damage and/or promote tissue repair after injury even without the appearance of BMDE. Such effects have been reported, for example, after administration of either LPS or bleomycin with busulfan (17, 18, 21, 22). The mechanism(s) underlying these effects are not yet known, but in vitro studies strongly suggest that anti-inflammatory paracrine factors are produced when MSC are co-cultured with alveolar macrophages (21). BM-derived cells may also induce production of proangiogenic factors.

The presence of circulating epithelial progenitor cells, which may or may not be derived from the bone marrow, is suggested by studies using multiple different approaches. When two mice were surgically linked side by side so that they had shared circulatory systems, a process called Parabiosis, and the lung tissue of one of the mice was injured by irradiation with or without elastase, the healing lung tissue contained type I pneumocytes that had been derived from the uninjured mouse (42). Similarly, when a denuded trachea was transplanted into a mouse, the epithelial cells that grew in the ectopically transplanted trachea were derived from the recipient (40). Whether the circulating cells are true progenitor cells or differentiated epithelial cells is not yet known. Intratracheal transplantation of mature type II pneumocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

BM-derived cells can take on the gene expression profile of lung epithelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms underlying this change in gene expression pattern are not yet known, nor is it known which BM populations are responsible. What we do know so far is that multiple different BM-derived cell populations, including marrow stromal cells (aka mesenchymal stem cells) and hematopoietic cells, are capable of being reprogrammed. Regarding the mechanism, some BM-derived epithelial cells form by cell–cell fusion, which presumably involves fusion of a BM-derived blood cell such as a macrophage with an injured epithelial cell; while other BMDE do not show evidence of having been derived from cell fusion. Although there is still much research to be done, a better understanding of the reprogramming of BM-derived cells may lead to discovery of novel pathologic processes and/or clinically relevant approaches to promoting tissue repair.

FOOTNOTES

Supported by NIH DK61846, NIH HL073742, and NIH DK072442.

Conflict of Interest Statement: D.S.K. performed studies for Boehringer Ingelheim in 2006 and 2007 for which Boehringer Ingelheim provided $80,000 to her laboratory.

(Received in original form December 23, 2007; accepted in final form January 29, 2008)

REFERENCES

  1. Travis EL, Peters LJ, McNeill J, Thames HD Jr, Karolis C. Effect of dose-rate on total body irradiation: Lethality and pathologic findings. Radiother Oncol 1985;4:341–351.[Medline]
  2. Tucker SL, Travis EL. Time course for the hazard of radiation-induced pneumonitis death in mice. Int J Radiat Biol 1992;62:627–639.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. van Rongen E, Travis EL, Thames HDJ. Repair rate in mouse lung after clinically relevant radiation doses per fraction. Radiat Res 1995;141:74–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Theise N, Henegariu O, Grove J, Jagirdar J, Kao P, Crawford J, Badve S, Saxena R, Krause D. Radiation pneumonitis in mice: a severe injury model for pneumocyte engraftment from bone marrow. Exp Hematol 2002;30:1333–1338.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Herzog EL, Van Arnam J, Hu B, Krause DS. Threshold of lung injury required for the appearance of marrow-derived lung epithelia. Stem Cells 2006;24:1986–1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wolf N, Kone A, Priestley G, Bartelmez S. In vivo and in vitro characterization of long-term repopulating primitive hematopoietic cells isolated by sequential hoechst 33342-rhodamine 123 facs selection. Exp Hematol 1993;21:614–619.[Medline]
  7. Morrison SJ, Wandycz AM, Hemmati HD, Wright DE, Weissman IL. Identification of a lineage of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. Development 1997;124:1929–1939.[Abstract]
  8. Lanzkron SM, Collector MI, Sharkis SJ. Hematopoietic stem cell tracking in vivo: A comparison of short-term and long-term repopulating cells. Blood 1999;93:1916–1921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Simmons PJ, Gronthos S, Zannettino A, Ohta S, Graves S. Isolation, characterization and functional activity of human marrow stromal progenitors in hemopoiesis. Prog Clin Biol Res 1994;389:271–280.[Medline]
  10. Simmons PJ, Torok-Storb B. Identification of stromal cell precursors in human bone marrow by a novel monoclonal antibody, stro-1. Blood 1991;78:55–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Hay SJ, Shi S, Graves SE, Kortesidis A, Simmons PJ. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1827–1835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006;8:315–317.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Azizi S, Stokes D, Augelli B. DiGirolamo C, Prockop D. Engraftment and migration of human bone marrow stromal cells implanted in the brains of albino rats—similarities to astrocyte grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:3908–3913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kotton DN, Ma BY, Cardoso WV, Sanderson EA, Summer RS, Williams MC, Fine A. Bone marrow-derived cells as progenitors of lung alveolar epithelium. Development 2001;128:5181–5188.[Medline]
  16. Spees JL, Olson SD, Ylostalo J, Lynch PJ, Smith J, Perry A, Peister A, Wang MY, Prockop DJ. Differentiation, cell fusion, and nuclear fusion during ex vivo repair of epithelium by human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:2397–2402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ortiz LA, Gambelli F, McBride C, Gaupp D, Baddoo M, Kaminski N, Phinney DG. Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:8407–8411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Rojas M, Xu J, Woods CR, Mora AL, Spears W, Roman J, Brigham KL. Bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells in repair of the injured lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005;33:145–152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wang G, Bunnell BA, Painter RG, Quiniones BC, Tom S, Lanson NA Jr, Spees JL, Bertucci D, Peister A, Weiss DJ, et al. Adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma differentiate into airway epithelial cells: Potential therapy for cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:186–191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Loi R, Beckett T, Goncz KK, Suratt BT, Weiss DJ. Limited restoration of cystic fibrosis lung epithelium in vivo with adult marrow derived cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;173:171–179.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Gupta N, Su X, Popov B, Lee JW, Serikov V, Matthay M. Intrapulmonary delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves survival and attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lunginjury in mice. J Immunol 2007;179:1855–1863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Xu J, Woods CR, Mora AL, Joodi R, Brigham KL, Iyer S, Rojas M. Prevention of endotoxin-induced systemic response by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007;293:L131–L141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Davies JC, Potter M, Bush A, Rosenthal M, Geddes DM, Alton EW. Bone marrow stem cells do not repopulate the healthy upper respiratory tract. Pediatr Pulmonol 2002;34:251–256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Wagers AJ, Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, Weissman IL. Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science 2002;297:2256–2259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, Henegariu O, Hwang S, Gardner R, Neutzel S, Sharkis SJ. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell 2001;105:369–377.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Reyes M, Lenvik T, Lund T, Blackstad M, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 2002;418:41–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Ratajczak J, Miekus K, Kucia M, Zhang J, Reca R, Dvorak P, Ratajczak MZ. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mrna and protein delivery. Leukemia 2006;20:847–856.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Kucia M, Reca R, Campbell FR, Zuba-Surma E, Majka M, Ratajczak J, Ratajczak MZ. A population of very small embryonic-like (vsel) cxcr4(+)ssea-1(+)oct-4+ stem cells identified in adult bone marrow. Leukemia 2006;20:857–869.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Hardeman EC, Chiu CP, Minty A, Blau HM. The pattern of actin expression in human fibroblast x mouse muscle heterokaryons suggests that human muscle regulatory factors are produced. Cell 1986;47:123–130.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Willadsen SM. Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 1986;320:63–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Vassilopoulos G, Wang PR, Russell DW. Transplanted bone marrow regenerates liver by cell fusion. Nature 2003;422:901–904.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Wang X, Willenbring H, Akkari Y, Torimaru Y, Foster M, Al-Dhalimy M, Lagasse E, Finegold M, Olson S, Grompe M. Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature 2003;422:897–901.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Herzog EL, Van Arnam J, Hu B, Zhang J, Chen Q, Haberman AM, Krause DS. Lung-specific nuclear reprogramming is accompanied by heterokaryon formation and y chromosome loss following bone marrow transplantation and secondary inflammation. FASEB J 2007;21:2592–2601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Szatanek R, Weglarczyk K, Baran J, Urbanowicz B, Branski P, Ratajczak MZ, Zembala M. Tumour-derived microvesicles carry several surface determinants and mrna of tumour cells and transfer some of these determinants to monocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2006;55:808–818.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Ratajczak J, Wysoczynski M, Hayek F, Janowska-Wieczorek A, Ratajczak MZ. Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia 2006;20:1487–1495.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Aliotta JM, Sanchez-Guijo FM, Dooner GJ, Johnson KW, Dooner MS, Greer KA, Greer D, Pimentel J, Kolankiewicz LM, Puente N, et al. Alteration of marrow cell gene expression, protein production and engraftment into lung by lung-derived microvesicles: a novel mechanism for phenotype modulation. Stem Cells 2007;25:2245–2256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Brulport M, Schormann W, Bauer A, Hermes M, Elsner C, Hammersen FJ, Beerheide W, Spitkovsky D, Hartig W, Nussler A, et al. Fate of extrahepatic human stem and precursor cells after transplantation into mouse livers. Hepatology 2007;46:861–870.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Kucia M, Reca R, Jala VR, Dawn B, Ratajczak J, Ratajczak MZ. Bone marrow as a home of heterogenous populations of nonhematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia 2005;19:1118–1127.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Kucia M, Ratajczak J, Ratajczak MZ. Bone marrow as a source of circulating cxcr4+ tissue-committed stem cells. Biol Cell 2005;97:133–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Gomperts BN, Belperio JA, Rao PN, Randell SH, Fishbein MC, Burdick MD, Strieter RM. Circulating progenitor epithelial cells traffic via cxcr4/cxcl12 in response to airway injury. J Immunol 2006;176:1916–1927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kotton DN, Fabian AJ, Mulligan RC. Failure of bone marrow to reconstitute lung epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005;33:328–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Abe S, Boyer C, Liu X, Wen FQ, Kobayashi T, Fang Q, Wang X, Hashimoto M, Sharp JG, Rennard SI. Cells derived from the circulation contribute to the repair of lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:1158–1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wong AP, Dutly AE, Sacher A, Lee H, Hwang DM, Liu M, Keshavjee S, Hu J, Waddell TK. Targeted cell replacement with bone marrow cells for airway epithelial regeneration. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007;293:L740–L752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Yamada M, Kubo H, Kobayashi S, Ishizawa K, Numasaki M, Ueda S, Suzuki T, Sasaki H. Bone marrow-derived progenitor cells are important for lung repair after lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury. J Immunol 2004;172:1266–1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Macpherson H, Keir P, Webb S, Samuel K, Boyle S, Bickmore W, Forrester L, Dorin J. Bone marrow-derived sp cells can contribute to the respiratory tract of mice in vivo. J Cell Sci 2005;118:2441–2450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Spees JL, Pociask DA, Sullivan DE, Whitney MJ, Lasky JA, Prockop DJ, Brody AR. Engraftment of bone marrow progenitor cells in a rat model of asbestos-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:385–394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Suratt BT, Cool CD, Serls AE, Chen L, Varella-Garcia M, Shpall EJ, Brown KK, Worthen GS. Human pulmonary chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:318–322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Abe S, Lauby G, Boyer C, Rennard SI, Sharp JG. Transplanted bm and bm side population cells contribute progeny to the lung and liver in irradiated mice. Cytotherapy 2003;5:523–533.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Serrano-Mollar A, Nacher M, Gay-Jordi G, Closa D, Xaubet A, Bulbena O. Intratracheal transplantation of alveolar type ii cells reverses bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:1261–1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Spencer H, Rampling D, Aurora P, Bonnet D, Hart SL, Jaffe A. Transbronchial biopsies provide longitudinal evidence for epithelial chimerism in children following sex mismatched lung transplantation. Thorax 2005;60:60–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kleeberger W, Versmold A, Rothamel T, Glockner S, Bredt M, Haverich A, Lehmann U, Kreipe H. Increased chimerism of bronchial and alveolar epithelium in human lung allografts undergoing chronic injury. Am J Pathol 2003;162:1487–1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krause, D. S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krause, D. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS